State: Texas Clear all filters (79 of 2372 reviews match)
filters
State:
City:
Show
Product:
Show
1.0
Details
To Amazon This is really irritating and very irresponsible to me for fronting money for the Tile pre-order to get completely screwed out of my money... what is wrong with you people. I will NEVER believe in Amazon's integrity and will never again let you play with my...
View full review
Review
#583093 Review #583093 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Product
Amazon Account
Cons
  • Fraud
Reason of review
Problem with delivery
Loss
$60
Preferred solution
Let the company propose a solution

Resolved: Amazon review in Austin, Texas: Never delivered!

I usually love Amazon, but recently I ordered a product online and that changed my entire view about them. product never arrived from amazon seller! I will never order from Amazon again, next time I will go with ebay! I usually love Amazon, but recently I ordered a product online and that changed my entire view about them. product never arrived from amazon seller! I will never order from Amazon again, next time I will go with ebay!I usually love Amazon, but recently I ordered a product online and that changed my entire view about them. product never arrived from amazon seller! I will never order from Amazon again, next time I will go with ebay!
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#928067

You should contact Amazon... They generally refund quickly for orders that were never received.

Resolved
Review
#576800 Review #576800 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Reason of review
Problem with delivery
Preferred solution
Full refund
5.0
Details
It doesn't matter if you returned rental book on time or not. I returned the rental text book to Apex_media on time, and what happened? They charged the full book price next week and they sent to me e-mail the book was binding damaged. It was perfect condition when i...
View full review
5 comments
Anonymous
#1264367

This is exact situation just happened to me with the same seller. I WAS CHARGED $172 WHEN I COULD HAVE PURCHASED BRAND NEW FROM AMAZON FOR $60.

Don't rent book from Apex_media

View more comments
Review
#575951 Review #575951 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Pros
  • Customer service
Reason of review
Damaged or defective
1.0
Details

Update by user Jan 22, 2015

I got my money back from the TRS company. but the issue was not resolved in time to complete the purchase in time for Christmas.

Original review posted by user Dec 23, 2014

I would like to start by saying I’ve spent over $15k on amazon over the last 5 years and I told everyone who would listen how great amazon...
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#973875

Yes, They are All CROOKS on Amazon & getting worse, we will NEVER use them again, the people saying, they like them, just wait. Your time is coming!

They WILL take you before its OVER! Hooya

Review
#573827 Review #573827 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Cons
  • Customer service
Reason of review
Poor customer service
Loss
$300
Preferred solution
Let the company propose a solution

Amazon review in Houston, Texas: Sports Apparel & Intimates WORST CUSTOMER SERVICE

THIS IS THE ONLY SELLER I'VE HAD PROBLEMS WITH AT AMAZON.COM. THEY WERE RUDE, AND TRIED TO BLAME THEIR NON DELIVERY OF MY ORDER WITH THE LOCATION OF MY MAILBOX (BY MY FRONT DOOR, DUH!) DON'T BUY FROM THEM THEY ARE RUDE AND OBNOXIOUS "First, you could not possibly know my tone as you are not speaking to me. Second, not every American living in a house in the US receives mail at the driveway. I do not, and I live in a very upscale neighborhood in ATL." "I do not see a mailbox at your home, how do you get your mail? and look at the USPS tracking, it has been bouncing around TX for 2 weeks." WAS HIS RESPONSE. They even Googled my address! RUDE RUDE RUDE! THEY DON'T WANT TO DO BUSINESS WITH ANYBODY!
View full review
Review
#567782 Review #567782 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Reason of review
Poor customer service

Amazon - Membership Review from Dallas, Texas

Hi, I have Purchased I phone 5 & few more products with Amazon online that was first time I purchased through my different credit cards. Today morning I have received a text from bank stating that $99 spent on my credit card for Amazon prime membership which I did not apply and not interested. I don know how this kind of incident can happen ?? How Amazon can use my credit card with out my permission. How Amazon can misuse my credit card that too 2 bank credit card which I used to purchased with them. I am really very very upset because of these thing happened to me being as a first time customer, Amazon gave me very very experience. Amazon made it to cross the credit limit. My bankers will charge me for crossed the limit which Amazon have to take care of it. I have attached screen shot proof. I want Amazon to refund the amount to my credit card asap and need a immediate action on this case. -NIRAI My h/p no : 520-328-4542
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#897127

I use Amazon all the time and I have never had a problem. Have you called them yet?

They have always been very professional and helpful when I have used them.

I have used them for Years. Good Luck.

Review
#555295 Review #555295 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership

Amazon - Online Order Review from Killeen, Texas

I ordered 6 different items that were posted as delivered by UPS 5 days ago and still haven't received them. I have contacted Amazon and UPS and they keep pointing the finger back at each other. What's the point in using Amazon if I have to drive to post office everytime a lazy UPS driver marks as having tried to deliver, but no one was home. I've had to call these places 3 times and list 5 different tracking numbers for each item. What a nightmare.
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#886318

The issue is not at Amazon. The issue is either on you, your carrier or both.

I deal with this kind of buyers everyday. Lazy carriers, new carriers, people forget apartment #s and believe or not some people do not know how to write a US address.

Trust me on this one.

Review
#547463 Review #547463 is a subjective opinion of poster.

Amazon review in Austin, Texas: DEFRAUDED OUT OF $321

Three years ago I clicked on the "FREE SHIPPING" link when I purchase some items. I do not know why I was not informed that this free shipping was going to cost me an annual membership of $107 a year. They said a pop-up came up and in small print it states the annual membership fee. I have pop-up blocker and need reading glasses too. I never saw that message about the membership fee. I often bought through Amazon over the past three years so with my busy schedule and frequent purchases I didn't notice the $107 charge till recently. Amazon refuses to pay the money back. My shipping would have been much less had I not clicked on the "FREE SHIPPING" link! I REFUSE DO BUSINESS WITH AMAZON AGAIN! I contacted a class action attorney who told me about the two laws below that our SUPREME COURT passed. IT IS URGENT THAT WE VOTE WISELY THIS ELECTION SEASON! Corporate America is buying our freedoms from the REPUBLICANS who constantly side with Corporate America instead of the united States citizen. PLEASE CLICK ON LINKS TO READ THE ARTICLES OR READ THE ARTICLES THAT I PASTED BELLOW! The ‘Citizens United’ decision and why it matters http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/10/18/11527/citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters?gclid=CjwKEAjwuYOeBRCy3pLljpjDkDcSJAAhA4mt-eNDxKF2qYF9gaktIoR9tFzDPuKuPX-ZjEB_PmZaoBoCdGjw_wcB By now most folks know that the U.S. Supreme Court did something that changed how money can be spent in elections and by whom, but what happened and why should you care? The Citizens United ruling, released in January 2010, tossed out the corporate and union ban on making independent expenditures and financing electioneering communications. It gave corporations and unions the green light to spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools, calling for the election or defeat of individual candidates. In a nutshell, the high court’s 5-4 decision said that it is OK for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they want to convince people to vote for or against a candidate. The decision did not affect contributions. It is still illegal for companies and labor unions to give money directly to candidates for federal office. The court said that because these funds were not being spent in coordination with a campaign, they “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.” So if the decision was about spending, why has so much been written about contributions? Like seven and eight-figure donations from people like casino magnate and billionaire Sheldon Adelson who, with his family, has given about $40 million to so-called “super PACs,” formed in the wake of the decision? For that, we need to look at another court case — SpeechNow.org v. FEC. The lower-court case used the Citizens United case as precedent when it said that limits on contributions to groups that make independent expenditures are unconstitutional. And that’s what led to the creation of the super PACs, which act as shadow political parties. They accept unlimited donations from billionaires, corporations and unions and use it to buy advertising, most of it negative. The Supreme Court kept limits on disclosure in place, and super PACs are required to report regularly on who their donors are. The same can’t be said for “social welfare” groups and some other nonprofits, like business leagues. These groups can function the same way as super PACs, so long as election activity is not their primary activity. But unlike the super PACs, nonprofits do not report who funds them. That’s disturbing to those who favor transparency in elections. An attempt by Congress to pass a law requiring disclosure was blocked by Republican lawmakers. The Citizens United decision was surprising given the sensitivity regarding corporate and union money being used to influence a federal election. Congress first banned corporations from funding federal campaigns in 1907 with the Tillman Act. In 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act extended the ban to labor unions. But the laws were weak and tough to enforce. It wasn’t until 1971 that Congress got serious and passed the Federal Election Campaign Act, which required the full reporting of campaign contributions and expenditures. It limited spending on media advertisements. But that portion of the law was ruled unconstitutional — and that actually opened the door for the Citizens United decision. Spending is speech, and is therefore protected by the Constitution — even if the speaker is a corporation. AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/att-mobility-v-concepcion/ Docket No. 09-893 Op. Below 9th Cir. Argument Nov 9, 2010 Tr.Aud. Opinion Apr 27, 2011 Vote 5-4 Author Scalia Term OT 2010 Holding: California state contract law, which deems class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unenforceable when certain criteria are met, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act because it stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. Plain English Holding: Under the Federal Arbitration Act, California must enforce arbitration agreements even if the agreement requires that consumer complaints be arbitrated individually (instead of on a class-action basis). Judgment: Ninth Circuit Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on April 27, 2011. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/10/18/11527/citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters?gclid=CjwKEAjwuYOeBRCy3pLljpjDkDcSJAAhA4mt-eNDxKF2qYF9gaktIoR9tFzDPuKuPX-ZjEB_PmZaoBoCdGjw_wcB WHO WILL YOU VOTE FOR THIS YEAR? CUT AND PASTE THESE LAWS AND PASS THEM ON.
View full review
3 comments
Anonymous
#842325

Nateprick,

You obviously are biased and probably work for Amazon. *** sounds like your eternal dwelling place!

Anonymous
#842323

Corporate America is robbing the United States citizen of justice and freedom by paying off politicians (mostly Republicans) to pass laws that prevent US citizens justice in the court system, favoring corporate America and thus enslaving Americans.

Anonymous
#841484

This seems to be a plug for personal political preferences and not a legitimate complaint. It is up to the consumer to read the fine print on anything they purchase, online or in person.

If you have a popup blocker, the very act of allowing the page to display it should have alerted you to the need to pay attention. I'd suggest a book on computer literacy and recommend you change the font display size in either your operating system or your web browser. Ignorance is not an excuse, nor is inadequate vision.. I should know.

As for the politics, if you don't like corporations advancing their agenda's in order to grow and preserve their business (and the global economy), there may be room at Walden Pond.

I hear sun dried bricks are the new stucco!

Good luck. Pieces of love.

View more comments (2)
Review
#509354 Review #509354 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Loss
$321

Book Rental Review

Rented a book for a fair price and blindly trusted the service because I trust Amazon. I returned the book on time and in the same condition I received it. Today I received an email informing me that my return was "rejected" (because of supposed torn pages) and I was simultaneously charged over $350! What a scam! The book is not even worth $300 brand new! Apex Media needs to be marked fraudulent because they stole my money! They are thieves! *It is worth mentioning that Amazon's representatives seemed to do all they could to help me. Still, I can not say I am impressed with their policy on this issue. I am a college student and already facing financial hardships. What a burden this has become!
View full review
Review
#494179 Review #494179 is a subjective opinion of poster.
They have an F rating from the BBB! This company dominates the Amazon marketplace. I buy several textbooks through Amazon for my bookstore. I would buy from 1 non-neebo named seller only to have the books shipped by this company and other non-neebo named sellers...
View full review
Review
#492208 Review #492208 is a subjective opinion of poster.