Product: Amazon Membership Clear all filters (44 of 44 reviews match)
Filter by rating
filters
Seller:
Show
State:
Show
City:
Show
Product:
After checking my account balance I was shocked to find that $99.0 was removed for a Prime Membership that I never asked for and frankly do not give a *** about.How is this legal?I never once in any way shape or form authorized the withdrawal.I participate in no...
View full review
3 comments
Anonymous
#922224

This happened to me last month. I found that Amazon had charged my credit card for Prime membership... and I did not ask for it. I called them and complained.. and they ref...

Review
#574502 Review #574502 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Reason of review
STOLEN MONEY!!
Loss
$99
Preferred solution
Full refund
1.4
Details
I received an invitation for a Amazon Echo for $99. My neighbor also received the same invitation to order the Echo for $99. We are both Prime members. We both placed our orders yesterday, Tuesday (Nov. 25th). My neighbor received an email stating she would receive...
View full review
2 comments
Anonymous
#919986

if something is out of stock you don't get it in 2 days, right? Relax.

Review
#562340 Review #562340 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Reason of review
Problem with delivery
Hi, I have Purchased I phone 5 & few more products with Amazon online that was first time I purchased through my different credit cards. Today morning I have received a text from bank stating that $99 spent on my credit card for Amazon prime membership which I did...
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#897127

I use Amazon all the time and I have never had a problem. Have you called them yet? They have always been very professional and helpful when I have used them. I have used them...

Review
#555295 Review #555295 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
2.0
Details
I had a membership to Amazon Prime. On September 25th, they automatically deducted $102. from checking account WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE. I had absolutely no idea they were going to charge my debt card. When I called they said it was an "AUTOMATIC" deduction. Can you...
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#891022

Since my original complaint. Amazon have not apologized. They cancelled my account even after it was of course paid for. Said I'd get a refund in 2 -3 business days. It was Fr...

Review
#538934 Review #538934 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Reason of review
deducted $102 from my checking account without authorization!
Loss
$103

BEWARE OF AMAZON

1.0
Details
Yesterday I sent back a bunch of stuff I needed to return to AMAZON oh wait that was in Monday9/15/2015 we'll apparently I received an email today stating they had closed my account so I emailed them back an all they could say is after closely reviewing your account we now have to end our business relationship. NEEDLESS TO SAY I EMAILED THEM TO LET THEM KNOW NOT ONLY DO I WANT A REFUND FOR MY PRIME MEMBERSHIP I ALSO LET POLITELY KNOW SINCE THEY CHOSE TO CLOSE MY ACCOUNT WITHOUT A REASONABLE EXPLANATION I LET THEM AND THE AMAZON STORE CARD KNOW THEY ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BALANCE ON THE ACCOUNT. I went on to say I plan to contact the FTC and The BBB as well as contact the general attorney if they do not take care of it. I AM ALSO THINKING OF SUEING THEM FOR DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE I DID NOTHING WRONG
View full review
Review
#535568 Review #535568 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Reason of review
Received email stating my account was closed
Loss
$1000
Preferred solution
Full refund

Amazon - DEFRAUDED OUT OF $321

Three years ago I clicked on the "FREE SHIPPING" link when I purchase some items. I do not know why I was not informed that this free shipping was going to cost me an annual membership of $107 a year. They said a pop-up came up and in small print it states the annual membership fee. I have pop-up blocker and need reading glasses too. I never saw that message about the membership fee. I often bought through Amazon over the past three years so with my busy schedule and frequent purchases I didn't notice the $107 charge till recently. Amazon refuses to pay the money back. My shipping would have been much less had I not clicked on the "FREE SHIPPING" link! I REFUSE DO BUSINESS WITH AMAZON AGAIN! I contacted a class action attorney who told me about the two laws below that our SUPREME COURT passed. IT IS URGENT THAT WE VOTE WISELY THIS ELECTION SEASON! Corporate America is buying our freedoms from the REPUBLICANS who constantly side with Corporate America instead of the united States citizen. PLEASE CLICK ON LINKS TO READ THE ARTICLES OR READ THE ARTICLES THAT I PASTED BELLOW! The ‘Citizens United’ decision and why it matters http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/10/18/11527/citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters?gclid=CjwKEAjwuYOeBRCy3pLljpjDkDcSJAAhA4mt-eNDxKF2qYF9gaktIoR9tFzDPuKuPX-ZjEB_PmZaoBoCdGjw_wcB By now most folks know that the U.S. Supreme Court did something that changed how money can be spent in elections and by whom, but what happened and why should you care? The Citizens United ruling, released in January 2010, tossed out the corporate and union ban on making independent expenditures and financing electioneering communications. It gave corporations and unions the green light to spend unlimited sums on ads and other political tools, calling for the election or defeat of individual candidates. In a nutshell, the high court’s 5-4 decision said that it is OK for corporations and labor unions to spend as much as they want to convince people to vote for or against a candidate. The decision did not affect contributions. It is still illegal for companies and labor unions to give money directly to candidates for federal office. The court said that because these funds were not being spent in coordination with a campaign, they “do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.” So if the decision was about spending, why has so much been written about contributions? Like seven and eight-figure donations from people like casino magnate and billionaire Sheldon Adelson who, with his family, has given about $40 million to so-called “super PACs,” formed in the wake of the decision? For that, we need to look at another court case — SpeechNow.org v. FEC. The lower-court case used the Citizens United case as precedent when it said that limits on contributions to groups that make independent expenditures are unconstitutional. And that’s what led to the creation of the super PACs, which act as shadow political parties. They accept unlimited donations from billionaires, corporations and unions and use it to buy advertising, most of it negative. The Supreme Court kept limits on disclosure in place, and super PACs are required to report regularly on who their donors are. The same can’t be said for “social welfare” groups and some other nonprofits, like business leagues. These groups can function the same way as super PACs, so long as election activity is not their primary activity. But unlike the super PACs, nonprofits do not report who funds them. That’s disturbing to those who favor transparency in elections. An attempt by Congress to pass a law requiring disclosure was blocked by Republican lawmakers. The Citizens United decision was surprising given the sensitivity regarding corporate and union money being used to influence a federal election. Congress first banned corporations from funding federal campaigns in 1907 with the Tillman Act. In 1947, the Taft-Hartley Act extended the ban to labor unions. But the laws were weak and tough to enforce. It wasn’t until 1971 that Congress got serious and passed the Federal Election Campaign Act, which required the full reporting of campaign contributions and expenditures. It limited spending on media advertisements. But that portion of the law was ruled unconstitutional — and that actually opened the door for the Citizens United decision. Spending is speech, and is therefore protected by the Constitution — even if the speaker is a corporation. AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/att-mobility-v-concepcion/ Docket No. 09-893 Op. Below 9th Cir. Argument Nov 9, 2010 Tr.Aud. Opinion Apr 27, 2011 Vote 5-4 Author Scalia Term OT 2010 Holding: California state contract law, which deems class-action waivers in arbitration agreements unenforceable when certain criteria are met, is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act because it stands as an obstacle to the accomplishment and execution of the full purposes and objectives of Congress. Plain English Holding: Under the Federal Arbitration Act, California must enforce arbitration agreements even if the agreement requires that consumer complaints be arbitrated individually (instead of on a class-action basis). Judgment: Ninth Circuit Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Scalia on April 27, 2011. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion. Justice Breyer filed a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan. http://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/10/18/11527/citizens-united-decision-and-why-it-matters?gclid=CjwKEAjwuYOeBRCy3pLljpjDkDcSJAAhA4mt-eNDxKF2qYF9gaktIoR9tFzDPuKuPX-ZjEB_PmZaoBoCdGjw_wcB WHO WILL YOU VOTE FOR THIS YEAR? CUT AND PASTE THESE LAWS AND PASS THEM ON.
View full review
3 comments
Review
#509354 Review #509354 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Loss
$321
As I am a first time customer with Amazon I got online, I found what I was looking for so I ordered the product, the rep talked me into a 2 day delivery. I said no I am not in a hurry, so then he tells me it was something they did for first time customers. Based on his...
View full review
94 comments
lindajohn
#1731842

I am Linda John from Arizona. I do work for so many digital apps and exchanging digital currency. , Amazon Prime Refund Policy is very easy to get more help call on Toll Free ...

Review
#491807 Review #491807 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Loss
$135
I have been an Amazon Prime Member for two years now. I placed 5 orders last month, 3 were late, one was lost and, only one made it on time. Also if you pay attention, the Prime shipping rates are added into the price of what you order. If you check the other...
View full review
Review
#490924 Review #490924 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
It's just simply a bad idea to start for a company to not ask you if you'd like to continue to membership after a free trial period. Amazon invites you to try it (their home movie watching club - whatever they call it) for a month and if by the end of that month you...
View full review
3 comments
Anonymous
#791804

As a former AMAZON addict. I get it. they have no overhead, they have less cost for everything and still just can't seem to keep prices down and the changing from one minute...

Review
#478013 Review #478013 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Loss
$83
This company not only staffs rude people at the bottom, but sets policies showing bad decisions at the top. I joined for a free trial of Amazon Prime, then one week later received a Smart TV for xmas, which said it came with a 30 day trial. So I cancelled the...
View full review
1 comment
Anonymous
#597777

BOUGHT A JUICER within 6 hours of delivery i found out it DID NOT WORK.. they give u th e runaround the mfg will not give u refund because of some of the buyers buy pallets ...

Review
#375158 Review #375158 is a subjective opinion of poster.
Service
Amazon Membership
Loss
$79